Single choice · #158
Mr. Liu proposed: "Last year, during the short-term promotion, sales increased by 20%, so this time investing another 5 million in short-term promotions will definitely boost annual performance." From the perspective of the five-step logical closure method, what does this plan most lack?
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
- AClear conclusion—it does not specify how much money to invest or what promotion to run.✗ Incorrect. The conclusion, 'invest 5 million in short-term promotions,' is already specific; it does not lack a clear conclusion.
- BGeneral principle—it does not explain the relationship between promotions and sales.✗ Incorrect. 'Short-term promotions can boost sales' is the implied general principle; Mr. Liu already holds this principle, but the issue is that he fails to check its applicability boundary.
- CSpecific facts—it does not provide any data from last year's promotion.✗ Incorrect. The stem already provides the fact of 'a 20% increase in sales'; what is missing is not the fact but a reflection on whether this fact is sustainable.
- DExceptions and boundaries—it does not consider that the boost from short-term promotion may be a one-time stimulus, with performance declining after the promotion ends, and it also lacks stop-loss or exit conditions.✓ Correct. Short-term promotions may borrow from future demand, so one cannot directly conclude that annual performance will improve; it is necessary to set up a pilot phase, observation period, and stopping criteria.
Explanation:Mr. Liu's reasoning is a typical case of 'one-time policy stimulus' without checking boundaries. Last year's 20% increase during the short-term promotion might have been borrowing from future demand, and it does not naturally lead to the conclusion that annual performance will definitely improve. The fifth step of the closure method requires specifying under what conditions the plan is not applicable or should be stopped, and this is precisely what the plan lacks the most.