Single choice · #216
The renovation contract for Old Zhang's house states: "The project is considered complete when the walls are smooth, free of hollow areas, and water and electrical tests pass." When the work was finished, the contractor said: "Overall it's done, more or less ready for acceptance." Old Zhang tapped three walls with a hollow-detection hammer and found two hollow areas. Which of the following evaluations is most accurate?
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
- AThere are degrees of renovation quality, and the contract doesn't specify how large a hollow area counts as unqualified, so the law of excluded middle does not apply here.✗ Incorrect. This misconception treats a question with clear acceptance criteria as a matter of degree. The contract explicitly states "no hollow areas," so whether the standard is met can be judged accordingly; the law of excluded middle applies precisely to such clearly defined issues that are being vaguely phrased.
- BWhether the work is complete is judged by the contract standard, which has clear boundaries; finding hollow areas means the standard is not met, and "more or less" is an evasion of inspection.✓ Correct. "Whether the contract is fulfilled" is defined by clear acceptance criteria; discovering hollow areas means the "no hollow areas" condition is not satisfied, so the work is not complete. "Overall done" and "more or less" are vague expressions used to evade inspection against the standard.
- CThe contractor has a good attitude and proactively said "more or less," so Old Zhang should first be considerate and pay, and fix the hollow areas gradually later.✗ Incorrect. This misconception treats a standards issue as a matter of attitude and personal relations. The dispute appears to be about attitude, but the substance is that the standard is not unified and inspection is avoided through vague wording; being accommodating does not answer whether the standard is met.
- DOld Zhang only tapped three walls, which is insufficient evidence; before tapping all the walls, whether the work is complete can never be determined.✗ Incorrect. This misconception confuses "temporarily unable to judge due to insufficient evidence" with "already determinable by the standard." Completion requires all walls to meet the standard; two hollow areas already constitute a clear counterexample of non-compliance, so there is no need to tap all the walls.
Explanation:The key is recognizing a situation where boundaries are clear but expressed vaguely. The contract specifies the completion standard (smooth walls, no hollow areas, water and electrical tests passing), so "whether the contract is fulfilled" is subject to the law of excluded middle: it either meets the standard or it does not. Old Zhang found two hollow areas, so by the standard, the work is not complete; "overall done" and "more or less" are vague expressions used to evade inspection. The three distractors correspond to typical misconceptions: treating it as a matter of degree, treating it as a matter of attitude/personal relations, and treating it as insufficient evidence.